Does our idea of education still make sense?

For a long time, the concept of education remained virtually unchanged: a long, linear cycle of study consisting of theory, exams, and—ultimately—a degree. It was a path that was taken only once, at the beginning of one's professional life, and promised a stable place in the world of work. But is that vision of education still valid today? Or are we facing a paradigm shift, in which knowledge is built in a continuous, fluid, modular, and—above all—much faster way? First of all, it should be noted that education has not changed much, even though solutions for a different approach are within reach. Education is perhaps one of the fields where there is still the most resistance. 1. The speed of change has outpaced the slowness of traditional training. We live in an age where technical skills become obsolete within a few years, if not months. According to the World Economic Forum, by 2025, 50% of the global workforce will need to be retrained to remain competitive. That's a huge number. Meanwhile, academic programs continue to require years of study, often with curricula that are disconnected from the skills actually required by companies. The most immediate consequence is that many graduates leave the education system with theoretical knowledge but lacking practical skills, struggling to find a suitable position, or being forced to retrain once they enter the job market, or even not using the skills they have learned at all, working in a different sector. 2. Training has become continuous, personalized, and digital. The digital revolution has completely reshaped the way we learn. Traditional methods, such as classroom courses or postgraduate master's degrees, now coexist with a multitude of flexible solutions: Microlearning: quick training pills, often available in video or podcast format. E-learning and MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses): courses that can be accessed anytime, anywhere. Bootcamps and practical workshops: intensive courses focused on specific skills (especially in the tech field). Learning on the job: learning integrated into daily work, with the support of internal platforms and knowledge bases. In this context, training is no longer "something you do," but a continuous, often self-directed activity, tailored to the needs of the individual and the professional context. The point is not to replace old qualifications, but to ask ourselves what opportunities arise from observing these new learning methods. At present, the two worlds seem unwilling to talk to each other: on the one hand, there is "classical" training, and on the other, more immediate and usable methods. 3. Certifications vs. academic qualifications: a new hierarchy of knowledge Another crucial aspect concerns skills assessment. More and more companies, especially in technical and digital fields (programming, cybersecurity, cloud computing, data analysis), evaluate candidates on the basis of specific certifications, proven skills, and real projects, rather than academic qualifications. An AWS, Google, or Microsoft certificate is often very valuable, especially when accompanied by practical experience, which is surprising when you consider that this type of training has to compete in the same sector with computer science degrees. In digital marketing, HubSpot, Meta, or Google Ads certifications count for a lot, and the alternative would be a master's degree lasting at least one year, not to mention the Italian "laurea magistrale" (master's degree). Soft skills and transferable skills, such as problem solving or collaboration, are also beginning to be mapped and certified by ad hoc platforms. This does not mean that academic qualifications no longer have value, but that they are losing their exclusive role as a 'guarantee' of preparation. The focus is increasingly shifting to what you can do, not what qualifications you have. We should not miss this opportunity to innovate even in the more traditional areas of education. 4. Continuing education as a mindset, not just a tool One of the most profound changes in recent years is that training has ceased to be an episodic event—the annual course, the postgraduate master's degree, the refresher seminar—and has become a permanent attitude. Let's talk about lifelong learning: a mental approach rather than an operational one, in which every stage of your career is an opportunity to learn. This approach is essential in a context where:
  • Business models are changing rapidly;
  • Technologies emerge and consolidate within months;
  • The skills required vary depending on roles, projects, and markets.
  • Investing in continuing education therefore means developing the ability to adapt, making people more resilient and proactive. It means moving away from the logic of "I study now to work tomorrow" and embracing that of "I learn today to better cope with change."
Not surprisingly, companies that actively promote continuing education show:
  • Greater talent retention;
  • Better performance in crisis scenarios;
  • A more widespread culture of innovation.
Ultimately, continuous learning is no longer an option for the curious or ambitious few, but a necessity for anyone who wants to remain relevant in their field. Our concept of the "student" will be increasingly challenged. University classrooms should not only be filled with young people who are still far from the world of work or just starting out, but should also include career professionals, people seeking retraining, and so on. 4. True value today: lifelong learning If there is one certainty, it is that training can no longer end today. It is not a switch that turns off after graduation or a refresher course. It is a habit, a mindset, a muscle to be trained. Those who have understood this scenario have taken action. It is obvious that selecting good talent is only part of the issue; the other part concerns keeping the skills within an organization up to date and able to meet the challenges of the contemporary world. The most advanced and forward-thinking companies are investing in this direction:
  • Internal corporate academies, to build specific skills.
  • Upskilling and reskilling plans, often customized.
  • Peer-to-peer learning: knowledge circulates among colleagues and within internal communities.
  • Learning Experience Platforms (LXP) that suggest tailored content, integrating AI and machine learning.
The message is clear: those who don't learn will be left behind. But to do so, you need tools that are flexible, accessible, and above all, useful in the real-world context of work. Conclusion: a new approach to training This is not to say that training no longer makes sense. On the contrary, it is more crucial than ever. But it cannot be the same as it was yesterday. We need training that is more agile, more targeted, closer to the real needs of the job, and that rewards the ability to learn quickly and independently. We also need a work culture that does not judge by title, but values paths, results, and demonstrable skills. In a world where changing careers several times in your life is normal and will become increasingly common, the real difference will not be what you studied, but how willing you are to continue learning.
Back to top